I'm sorry for another f/2.8 vs f/4 thread, but I couldn't find some answers in the existing ones. I have R62 and R7 with RF 24-70 f/2.8, EF 70-200 f/4L and EF 100-400 L IS II. I shoot animals, airplanes and standard photos (family, trips, etc.) I love my EF 70-200 f/4L, but I didn't use it much since I got 100-400 and that's because of lack of IS. wrote: "No doubt the two Tamron lenses will give you great results." Yes, this is a fact. They some are very good. As an example I don't know if I would choose the Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Lens over my Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Lens but there is no doubt I would take it over my Nikon Canon 24-105 F4 IS vs Canon 24-70 F2.8 vs Tamron/Sigma 24-70 F2.8 IS for all round, transport and landscape. r/canon • 24mm f/1.4L USM Mk2 versus 16-35mm f/4L Another is that the latest EF version of the 24-70 f/2.8 (the Mk II) can be had for about half the price of the RF version (where I am at least), so there's probably a good $1000 to be saved at the outset if they go with the EF Mk II. The 24-105 f4 RF maybe a mini van lens. From what I see the RF version is better than the EF version. The 24-70 f2.8 is over 2x the cost of the 24-105 f4. I would expect anything that costs over 2.x the cost to be better. I would expect a $45K mini van to be much nicer than a $25K mini van. Depends on your budget and income and needs/wants. Costing $999, the Tokina 24-70mm f/2.8 isn’t cheap, but if it offers comparable image quality, it could represent great value compared to such own-brand options as the $1749 Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM or the $1797 Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED. We ran the Canon EF version of the Tokina 24-70mm f/2.8 though our industry-standard tests to see how NiiDdpd. "No doubt the two Tamron lenses will give you great results." Yes, this is a fact. They some are very good. As an example I don't know if I would choose the Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Lens over my Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM Lens but there is no doubt I would take it over my Nikon AF-S NI Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 Di III VC VXD G2; Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM. $1,899.00 at Amazon At f/4 it shows 3,105 lines, with similar performance through much of the frame, but edges that What is the difference between Sony FE 24-70mm F/4 ZA OSS Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* and Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III RXD? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. f/2.8, f/8 and f/22 1:1 crops of analysed regions for 5Dmk3/24-70L . EF 24-70 vs EF 24-70 II Comparison – Aperture Sharpness Results. The above information shows the sort of results you can expect from the test with a single lens, but I wanted to show some comparative data from 20-30 copies of both the 24-70 Mark I and the 24-70 Mark II. has a silent focus motor built into the lens. Sony FE 12-24mm f/2.8 GM. Sony FE 12-24mm f/4 G. Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body focus motor. minimum focus distance. Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM (or perhaps a 16-35 f/4 or the new 24-105 is ii) Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM; Keep the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM due to f/1.4 which is occationally handy; I like this idea! Might be nice to keep the 100-400, but you could also just use a 2X Extender with the 70-200.

canon ef 24 70 f2 8 vs f4